Comparative Analysis
Military Professionalism Efficiency
High
Fair
Intermediate
Low
Very Low
| COUNTRY | GOVERNANCE | MILITARY PROFESSIONALISM |
SOCIAL PERCEPTIONS & CULTURAL ATTITUDES |
DEFENSE FINANCES & ECONOMICS |
CIVILIAN COMPETENCES |
| Egypt | 2.61 Intermediate Efficiency |
2.57 Low Efficiency |
2.45 Low Efficiency |
1.83 Low Efficiency |
1.88 Low Efficiency |
| Lebanon | 3.08 Intermediate Efficiency |
3.27 Intermediate Efficiency |
3.43 Fair Efficiency |
3.65 Fair Efficiency |
2.85 Intermediate Efficiency |
| Syria | 2.07 Low Efficiency |
1.93 Low Efficiency |
1.95 Low Efficiency |
2.11 Low Efficiency |
2.17 Low Efficiency |
| Tunisia | 4.39 High Efficiency |
4.13 Fair Efficiency |
3.60 Fair Efficiency |
4.02 Fair Efficiency |
3.03 Intermediate Efficiency |
Military Professionalism
Q1. What weighs more heavily in shaping the organization and operational capability of the national armed forces: professional assessment of defense needs or political factors?
| Egypt |
 Low Efficiency |
| Lebanon |
 Intermediate Efficiency |
| Syria |
 Low Efficiency |
| Tunisia |
 Fair Efficiency |
Q2. How well bound is the military by a professional ethic?
| Egypt |
 Intermediate Efficiency |
| Lebanon |
 Fair Efficiency |
| Syria |
 Low Efficiency |
| Tunisia |
 High Efficiency |
Q3. How well-defined, regulated, and transparent is the military justice system?
| Egypt |
Low Efficiency |
| Lebanon |
 Fair Efficiency |
| Syria |
 Very Low Efficiency |
| Tunisia |
Fair Efficiency |
Q4. Is military education conducive to professional development and performance and to stable civil-military relations?
| Egypt |
 Intermediate Efficiency |
| Lebanon |
 Intermediate Efficiency |
| Syria |
Low Efficiency |
| Tunisia |
 High Efficiency |
Military Professionalism: Comparative Maturity
Toggle labels to filter countries
Efficiency Levels
|
GOVERNANCE
|
MILITARY
PROFESSIONALISM |
SOCIAL PERCEPTIONS
& CULTURAL ATTITUDES |
DEFENSE FINANCES
& ECONOMICS |
CIVILIAN
COMPETENCES |
